theinsiderone

On Monday, a jury in Colorado rejected a woman’s claim that she was mad when she assaulted her stepson, finding her guilty of murder in the death of her 11-year-old stepson.

Over three years after the prosecution said that Letecia Stauch stabbed Gannon Stauch 18 times before striking him in the head and then shooting him once, Letecia Stauch was found guilty of all charges she was facing in the slaying of Gannon Stauch. According to the prosecution, Stauch killed the kid in January 2020 because she despised him and wished to harm Al Stauch, the boy’s father, whom she intended to leave at the time and who was away on a National Guard deployment.

Stauch did not dispute that he had murdered Gannon and transported his body across the nation in a bag in the trunk of a hired vehicle. But

But she claimed to be insane and entered a not guilty plea. She killed Gannon, according to the defence, after a “psychotic break” brought on by the stress of being physically, emotionally, and sexually abused as a kid.

The state mental hospital’s experts came to the conclusion that Stauch was sane at the time Gannon was slain despite having a personality condition with borderline and narcissistic characteristics. That implies knowing the difference between good and wrong and having the capacity to create the intent to conduct a crime, according to Colorado law.A Colorado jury on Monday found a woman guilty of murder in the killing of her 11-year-old stepson, rejecting her argument that she was acting out of rage.

Dr. Dorothy Lewis, the primary witness for the defence who wrote the book “Crazy, Not Insane” and appeared in the HBO documentary of the same name, came to the conclusion that Stauch had dissociative identity disorder—a condition in which a person has two or more personalities as a result of trauma—and was not in a state of mind when Gannon was killed.

However, the prosecution emphasised that Lewis was ignorant of the legal definition of insanity in Colorado.

Stauch was being treated at a military health facility when she was referred to a psychologist, and she was given the diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder in the weeks before to the murder of Gannon. In her testimony, Stauch’s therapist Ronda Niederhauser stated that Stauch was conscious of her surroundings and did not exhibit any symptoms of being a threat to herself or others.

Authorities think Stauch murdered Gannon in his bedroom a couple of hours before Gannon went missing on January 27, 2020, claiming he hadn’t returned from playing with pals. Numerous people assisted in the hunt for the kid near the family’s home in Colorado Springs. However, further investigations showed that Stauchcreated a number of lies to deceive them, including the claim that a guy she hired to fix a carpet also assaulted her before kidnapping Gannon.

Al Stauch authorised the FBI to listen in on their phone conversations with him after growing suspicious of his wife in an effort to get additional information about where Gannon was from her. Hours of audio from those calls and videos of Stauch being interviewed about her mental health made up a significant portion of the testimony given during the five-week trial.

In a suitcase hidden beneath a bridge in the Florida Panhandle, bridge officials discovered Gannon’s remains in March 2020. In Pensacola, where she was staying with her daughter, the prosecution said that Stauch secretly left her hotel room to dispose of her son’s body in the hope that it would be washed into the Gulf of Mexico.

After a lengthy trial, Stauch was found guilty of first-degree murder, first-degree murder of a child by a person in a position of trust, tampering with a dead corpse, and tampering with tangible evidence.

As the verdict was announced, she sat at the defence table between her two solicitors without appearing to react in any way. Later, she sat there by herself, sipping water as people spoke in the courtroom.

The most recent comments made by Danielle Smith came from a podcast in 2021, not long after she quit her prior job as a radio talk show host. Danielle Smith has made a lot of bizarre (or at least intemperate) statements.

Smith didn’t quite say that.

How to Become a Tyrant was a Netflix series that Smith had been watching. (I didn’t like the six-part docuseries’ cutesy music, but the explanation of how tyrants seize and control nations is worth viewing.)

When countries are facing a catastrophe (like a pandemic), it is all too easily for them to fall for “experts” or strongmen who promise a quick and easy way to stability and safety, as the Germans did under Adolph Hitler, remarked Smith, who was a private person at the time.

Smith’s response was overly scholarly. And it shows a narrow understanding of how her statements may be taken. Her deafness to regular Albertans is what leads her into trouble more than anything else.

Nevertheless, Smith is the best protector Albertans currently have against the federal Liberals and the Alberta “progressives” who want to increase taxes, outlaw guns, cripple the energy industry, obstruct pipelines, restrict the use of farm fertilisers, censor the internet, increase spending, and continue to impose pandemic mandates, despite the fact that more and more evidence is being released all the time demonstrating that while vaccines worked, so did natural immunisation.

Additionally, outside from extremely particular situations like hospitals and senior living facilities, social withdrawal, masks, and lockdowns were mostly ineffective.

Smith may not be the best choice for our province, but is there anybody else who will be able to better fend against attacks on our economy and our way of life?autonomy and the way of life in Alberta?

Just this weekend, the federal Liberals reaffirmed their support for vaccine requirements at their national conference. This is interesting considering that Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau declared only a week prior that he had never pushed someone to become immunised. (He must believe that his ban on plastic straws was the reason for the Freedom Convoy.)

The Liberals supported requiring vaccinations for passengers travelling on commercial aircraft, cruise cruises, and other federally controlled vessels. Without vaccinations, federal employees would continue to lose their jobs, and the Trudeau administration would put pressure on companies in privately controlled sectors of the economy to implement vaccination requirements.

This is true even though a recent research published in the British medical journal The Lancet revealed that among 175,000 people, earlierDespite vaccinations being more effective against hospitalisation and mortality, infection with COVID offered higher protection against re-infection for a longer period of time.

Nearly as extreme a view, in the other way, as anti-vaccination, is the progressives’ unquestioning confidence in vaccine requirements.

Can you see Rachel Notley and the NDP defying federal pandemic orders given their adherence to an all-powerful government and government-approved science? or, for instance, the carbon tax?

I can’t.

If there is ever another pandemic, Albertans are much more likely to see more lockdowns, school closures, mask mandates, and vaccination passports under the New Democrats than they would the most recent science-based policy.

The wildfires and state of emergency have caused the provincial campaign to start slowly. The contrast is still, in my opinion, pretty sharp.

Under the NDP, both taxes and expenditure would increase. Energy policy would once more be in the hands of environmentalists. The health and safety laws that apply to industries and building sites would also apply to farmers.

And what about federal constitutional violations? The NDP supports the majority of Trudeau’s policies.

In the end, rather than Smith’s idiotic tantrums, I believe the NDP-Liberal alliance will decide this election.

Letecia Stauch was found guilty by a Colorado jury of murdering her stepson, age 11.

Smith is the finest defender of the way of life in Alberta despite the bozo outbursts, according to Gunter

professional news site